1993: Dr. med. Willibald Stangl, president of the Medical Officer Association of Lower Austria, tested the New Medicine on 250 cases. The result: 100% agreement with Dr. Hamer's findings.

 
1998: The Medical Faculty of the University of Trnava (Slovakia) tested seven patients with 20 specific medical conditions at the Sainte Elisabeth Institute of Oncology at Bratislava and the Oncology unit of the Hospital of Trnava. As stated in the official certification: The objective was to establish whether Dr. Hamer's system of medicine could be verified by using a scientific method to show that his results are repeatable. This has been the case. (see Trnava Document, 11.09.1998)

Since German New Medicine is based strictly on scientific criteria and applicable to practically all diseases known in medicine, the Five Biological Laws can be tested and verified in anyone's medical case. Considering the three levels of our organism (psyche, brain and organ), we are able to investigate the psychological, cerebral and physical development of a disease at every step and in every phase (Second Biological Law). The DHS (conflict shock), the conflict active phase, the conflict resolution, the healing phase and the Epileptoid Crisis (epi-crisis), can be observed together with the histological formation (Third Biological Law) and the microbial involvement (Fourth Biological Law) on all three levels at the same time. We are dealing here with what is called in science an over-determined system, wherein, if we know the condition of one level, we can conclude the condition of the other two. It is this over-determined system that separates the Five Biological Laws of German New Medicine® from the many theories of standard medicine.

 

 

 

Is conventional medicine scientific? Because of its many hypotheses - or rather unproven assumptions - conventional medicine it is neither a science, let alone a natural science. Conventional medicine cannot offer any hypothesis-free explanation concerning the biological processes taking place in the individual "sick person". Conventional medicine offers only statistics regarding the probability of surviving a particular cancer. Conventional medicine cannot offer any explanation as regards spontaneous healing.

Is German New Medicine scientific? German New Medicine offers a scientific, hypothesis-free, and verifiable theory regarding cancer and "diseases" in general. German the New Medicine is able to offer a scientific explanation of the disease development in any given case. As the development of each disease is predictable, German New Medicine is able to provide scientifically-based therapeutic recommendations for each individual patient. Complications that might arise can be anticipated and necessary measures can be integrated in the therapy.
 

SCIENTIFIC VERIFICATION

A claim or claims can only be considered scientific, if the claim or claims can be reproduced, i.e. verified, at any given time. Since the claims of conventional medicine are not verifiable, e.g. testable for accuracy in any given case, it seeks refuge in statistics. Statistics is a branch of mathematics and therefore considered a science. It is, however, not a natural science. Instead of offering a patient scientifically based therapeutic support, the doctor of conventional medicine can only offer statistics about the probability of survival. Today's medical physicians cannot offer any scientifically substantiated knowledge with respect to the healing of a disease.

Hypotheses are claims that have not been verified or are even unverifiable. In science, a hypothesis is a claim that has not (yet) been verified, i.e., proven of being accurate, but nonetheless serves as a basis on which other theories or predictions are built. When, for example, Isaac Newton presented his theory of gravitation, he was asked where gravitation originates. His reply: "I will not advance any hypotheses". What he meant was that anyone can test the postulates of the law of gravitation (in the parlance of the philosophy of science, falsify it). To explain gravitation itself, is, however, a different story.

In full accordance with the requirements for a true natural science, Dr. Hamer does not postulate a single hypothesis. His claims are testable and verifiable in every single case of cancer and cancer-equivalents, at any given point in time. In contrast, conventional medicine is based on assumptions that have never been verified.

For example, the hypothesis of an "immune system", postulated by conventional medicine, is an unverified claim, as no one has yet been able to directly observe it. The hypothesis of an immune-system, that is the assumption of the existence of an the immune-system, forms the basis on which other theories and predictions are built, leading to observable "facts", which are then erroneously considered as "proof" of - in this case - the existence of an "immune system".

Or: Conventional medicine claims that the activity of microbes in the body is due to the breakdown of the "immune-system". German New Medicine claims that the activity of microbes is triggered by a command of the brain which turns on a "Special Biological Program". Conventional medicine cannot scientifically substantiate or predict the activity of microbes in any given case. German New Medicine, on the other hand, is able to scientifically substantiate and predict the onset of microbial activity - in each individual case. According to GNM, the precise moment of the beginning of microbial activity is at the beginning of the second phase of the Special Biological Program.  German New Medicine is based on a psycho-biological understanding of the organism. It therefore does not need or does not rely on statistics. Colloquially speaking, conventional medicine offers a hodgepodge of pseudo-logical, unverified claims and is therefore unscientific. German New Medicine, on the other hand, offers a comprehensible structure of logical and reproducible claims, and is therefore scientific.